ID | #1622061635 |
Added | Wed, 26/05/2021 |
Author | July N. |
Sources | |
Phenomena | |
Status | Hypothesis
|
Initial data
April 01, 2001, close view of a large triangular object and other objects 1 of 2
Weather conditions: Clear, light wind, temperature around 40 F. Report type: Witness 1, close observation of a triangular object. At the same time, Witness 2 saw several distant lights. Assessment on the spot: witness 1 UFO, CE1 without explanation. Witness 2 possible ce1s, probably airplane lights.
Reference:
The witnesses, a married couple, called the UFO reporting center on the night of the sighting, and the witnesses ' details were passed to that investigator in October 2001. On 14 November 2001, the investigator questioned the witnesses for one hour at the observation site due to the lack of enthusiasm of the witnesses. Each of the two witnesses observed a different UFO. It is possible, but unlikely, that they were related, as they were several miles apart and their appearance was radically different.
Description of the witnesses:
Witness 1. Male, average age 30 years. Occupation: Works at an assembly plant in Stillwater. He was greatly impressed by the sight and that night spoke "about nothing else" with Witness 2, his wife. However, he was not injured. He did not speak about his appearance, except for a few people close to him before the interrogation of the investigator. No previous or subsequent UFO sightings. The witness was healthy, had good eyesight. The witness showed no particular interest in UFOs and had not read any books on the subject prior to his observation.
Witness 2. A woman, aged from 30 to 30 years, the wife of the Witness 1. Works at the place of residence. The witness appears to be in good physical condition. Vision and hearing are good. The witness was excited by this observation (even after 6 months), but did not describe any symptoms of trauma. No previous or subsequent UFO sightings. The witness showed no particular interest in UFOs and had not read any books on the subject before her observation. She read something after she saw it.
The witnesses were traveling east on Rt. 96, near the intersection with Highway 5 in a rural area 1-2 miles north of Stillwater, Minnesota (~ 22 miles east of St. Paul). The landscape is gently hilly, consisting of fields and woodlands. It was almost dark, but there was still light in the clear sky.
Witness 1,
Sitting on the passenger side of the car in which the witnesses were traveling, Witness 1 noticed a lighted triangular object to his right. The side of the object was about 250 feet. The witness reported that the triangle was equilateral, although in his (inaccurate) drawing it is depicted as isosceles. It was impossible to distinguish the texture on the surface of the object. A bright white light burned at each vertex of the triangle below the ship. The lights were not bright enough to illuminate the ground beneath the ship. In the center of the lower part of the triangle, there was also a red light, less bright than the white lights that flashed about once a second. There were no other light sources on the object, and no windows, openings, or other surface features were visible. The object's color was black, but not the same color as the stealth plane. The subject did not make a sound, although the witness did not get out of the car. It is known that other witnesses did not observe this object.
Position, movement, and duration. The nearest surface of the object was approximately at an angle of 60 degrees from the ground when the device was at a minimum altitude. When the object was first spotted, it was about 400 feet (120 m) above the ground, but "fairly quickly" descended to a height of about 150 feet (45 m) and hovered for a few seconds, then rose to a height of about 400 feet (120 m). There was no visible lateral movement of the object. The car was traveling at 45 miles per hour, but immediately after the object was detected, it slowed down to 10-15 miles per hour. The object was last seen in the back of the car, and it disappeared when the car drove too far away for the witness to see it. The duration of the visit was about 1 minute. Witness 2, the driver, did not see the object because she was concentrating on driving.
Drawing an object. After returning home, the witness made a drawing of the object (Figure 1), which looked almost the same as the drawing he made during the investigation. The original drawing was lost. After the sighting, he read some UFO literature, including reports of triangular objects sighted in Belgium in the early ' 90s.
Rating: CE1. The described object is similar to the description of many triangular objects that have been seen around the world over the past 20 years. There is no generally accepted explanation, except that it was a modern military aircraft. However, the currently known technology is not compatible with a device that can hover and quickly move vertically up and down without engine noise.
Witness 2
Description of the object. Witness 2 observed two white lights separated by the width of her thumb at arm's length, directly in front of her (to the east). The lights were estimated to be 15 miles away (although she highlighted the uncertainty of this estimate) and were visible at the same time as Witness 1 observed the triangular object to his right. Witness 1 also observed the two lights, but not closely, as he was busy observing the triangular object to his right. Witness 2 estimated the size of the lanterns to be about 1/8 the diameter of the Moon, and the brightness was brighter than that of a street lamp. Based on the inverse square law, this would mean that the brightness of the light is more than 225 times the internal brightness of the street lamp. As far as she could tell, the object wasn't illuminating the ground.
Position, movement, and duration. According to witness 2, the object was located at an altitude of about 20 degrees above the ground. This would make the height of the lights about 6 miles (~ 31,000 feet). The lights appeared stationary for about 1 minute, then moved rapidly downward until they disappeared behind the tree-fringed horizon about 3 seconds after they began their descent. The estimated speed was 7200 kmh. The lights disappeared around the same time that Witness 1 lost sight of the triangular object. Witnesses saw planes nearby, but Witness 2 was adamant that the lights she saw were not ordinary planes. The nearest airport is 9 miles southwest, 135 degrees to the right (behind) the direction in which the objects were sighted. There are no airports at least 40 miles east of the observation site.
Additional headlights. While the two lights were hovering, they emitted 2 smaller lights that circled down and back up and joined the main light a few seconds after they appeared. The witness was not able to estimate the speed of these lights and said that they were not as bright as the main lights.
Rating: Probably a regular plane. If the object was 1/8 the apparent diameter of the Moon and was 15 miles away, it would be a very large object indeed. At 225 times brighter than a street lamp, it would also be extremely bright. The downward speed of 7,200 mph is also unusual. The lack of other witnesses or press coverage of such a remarkable object, as well as the inexperience of the witness and the well-known difficulties in estimating the distances to light rays in the sky, lead the researcher to believe that the lights were probably much closer than assumed, and thus much smaller and less bright. Despite the absence of an airport in the direction of the surveillance, the presence of a major airport, MSP, 30 miles west of the surveillance site, the investigator believes that the lights may well have been attached to the aircraft. However, there is not enough information for an unambiguous judgment.
Original news
01 April, 2001, Close Sighting of Large Triangular Object and Other Objects 1 of 2
Weather conditions: Clear, light wind, temperature near 40 F.
Type of Report: Witness 1, Close sighting of triangular object. Simultaneously, witness 2 saw several
distant lights.
Local Evaluation: Witness 1 UFO, CE1 Unexplained. Witness 2 possible CE1, probably airplane lights.
Sighting background:
The witnesses, a married couple, called the UFO reporting center on the night of the sighting and witness data was relayed to this investigator in October, 2001. The investigator interviewed the witnesses on 14 November, 2001 for one hour, He did not visit the site of the sighting due to lack of enthusiasm to do so by the witnesses. Each of the 2 witnesses observed different UFOs. It is possible, but not likely, that they were related, since they were several miles apart and their appearance differed radically.
Witness Description:
Witness 1. Male, age middle 30s. Occupation: works at assembly plant in Stillwater. He was strongly impressed by the sighting and talked about “nothing else” that night with witness 2, his wife. However, he was not traumatized. He has not spoken about the sighting except for a few people close to him until the interview with the investigator. No previous or subsequent UFO sightings. Witness was in good health with good eyesight. The witness did not have any particular interest in UFOs and had not read any books on the subject before his sighting.
Witness 2. Female, age early-middle 30s, wife of Witness 1. Works in local area. Witness is apparently in good physical condition. Eyesight, hearing are good. Witness was excited about the sighting (even 6 months later) but did not describe any symptoms of trauma. No previous or subsequent UFO sightings. The witness did not have any particular interest in UFOs and had not read any books on the subject before her sighting. She has done some reading after the sighting.
Sighting Account.
The witnesses were driving east on Rt. 96 near the intersection with highway 5 in a rural area 1-2 miles north of Stillwater, MN ( ~22 miles east of St. Paul.) The landscape is gently rolling comprised of crop fields and wooded areas. It was nearly dark, but some light remained in the sky, which was clear.
Witness 1,
Object description.. Sitting on the passenger side of the car the witnesses were traveling in, witness 1 noticed a lighted, triangular object to his right. The object appeared to be about 250 ft on a side. The witness reported the triangle was equilateral, though his (inexact) drawing shows it as isosceles. It was not possible to discern a texture to the surface of the object. A bright white light was at each apex of the triangle underneath the craft. The lights were not bright enough to illuminate the ground beneath the craft. There was also a red light in the center of the bottom of the triangle, less bright than the white lights, which blinked about once per second. There were no other lights on the object and no windows, orifices or other surface features were visible. The color of the object was black, but not the same color as the stealth aircraft. The object produced no sound, although the witness did not get out of the car. No other witnesses are known to have observed the object.
Position, movement and duration. The nearest surface of the object was approximately at a 60 degree angle from the ground when the craft was at its lowest altitude. When first seen the object was about 400 ft above ground but moved down “quite rapidly” to about 150 ft and hovered for several seconds, then rose up to about 400 ft. There was no apparent lateral motion of the object. The car was moving about 45 mph but slowed to 10-15 mph immediately upon sighting of the object. The object was last seen to the rear of the car and disappeared when the car got too far away for the witness to see it. The duration of the sighting was about 1 minute. Witness 2, the driver, did not see the object because she was concentrating on driving.
Drawing of object. When he came home the witness made drawing of the object (Fig. 1) which looked substantially the same as the drawing he made during the investigation. The original drawing was lost. After the sighting, he read some UFO literature, including accounts of the triangular objects seen in Belgium in the early 90s. as shown in Figure 1.
Sighting evaluation: CE1. The object described is similar to the description of many triangular objects seen worldwide for the past 20 years. There is no conventional explanation apart from the possibility that the craft was an advanced military aircraft. However, current known technology is not consistent with a craft capable of hovering and moving rapidly vertically upward and downward without engine noise.
Witness 2
Object description. Witness 2 observed two white lights, separated by the width of her thumb at arms length directly in front of her (toward the east). The lights were estimated to be 15 miles away (though she emphasized the uncertainty of this estimate), and were seen at the same time as witness 1 observed the triangular object to his right. Witness 1 also observed the two lights, but not closely, since he was occupied with observing the triangular object to his right. Witness 2 estimated the size of the lights to be about 1/8th the diameter of the moon and the brightness as brighter than a streetlight. Based on the inverse square law, this would mean the lights were more than 225 times the intrinsic brightness of a streetlight. As far as she could tell the object was not illuminating the ground. No other witnesses are known to have observed the lights.
Position, movement, and duration. Witness 2 estimated that the object was about 20 degrees above the ground. This would make the altitude of the lights about 6 miles (~31,000 ft). The lights appeared motionless for about 1 minute, then moved downward rapidly until they disappeared below the tree-lined horizon about 3 seconds after they began their descent. The calculated speed of movement was 7200 mph. The lights disappeared at about the same time as witness 1 lost sight of the triangular object. The witnesses observed airplanes in the vicinity but witness 2 was adamant that the lights she saw were not conventional aircraft. The nearest airport is 9 miles to the southwest, 135 degrees to the right of (behind) the direction where the objects were sighted. There are no airports within at least 40 miles to the east of the sighting location.
Additional lights. During the time the 2 lights were hovering, they emitted 2 smaller lights which circled downward and back up and joined with the primary light a few seconds after they appeared. The witness had no estimate of the speed of these lights and said they were not quite as bright as the primary lights.
Sighting Evaluation: Probably conventional aircraft. If the object size was 1/8th the apparent diameter of the moon and 15 miles away, it would have been a very large object, indeed. At 225 times the brightness of a streetlight, it would also have been exceedingly bright. The downward speed of 7200 mph is also extraordinary. The lack of other witnesses or press coverage of such a remarkable object as well as the inexperience of the witness and the well known difficulty in judging distances of lights in the sky causes the investigator to believe that the lights were probably much closer than estimated and thus much smaller and less bright. Despite the lack of an airport in the direction of the sighting, the presence of a major airport, MSP, 30 miles west of the sighting causes the investigator to believe that the lights could very possibly have been attached to aircraft. However, there is not enough information to make an unambiguous judgment.
Hypotheses
Airplane / Helicopter

An aircraft heavier than air for flights in the atmosphere (and outer space (e.g. An orbital aircraft)), using the aerodynamic lift of a glider to keep itself in the air (when flying within the atmosphere) and the thrust of a power (propulsion) installation for maneuvering and compensating for the loss of total mechanical energy to drag.
A rotorcraft in which the lift and thrust required for flight are created by one or more main rotors powered by an engine or several engines. They differ in maneuverability, the ability to hover and almost vertical takeoff.
Investigation
Resume
Similar facts
Log in or register to post comments