Мы тестируем новую версию сайта. Эта версия обновляться не будет. Приносим извинения за временные неудобства.
We are testing a new version of the site. This version will not be updated. We apologise for any temporary inconvenience.
Estamos probando una nueva versión del sitio. Esta versión no se actualizará. Rogamos disculpen las molestias.

Site statistics

35225 facts from 177 countries related to 1198 phenomena have been registered in Archive. 2834 of them were solved, another 11033 are under verification for compliance with one of the 322 versions.

0 facts have been added for last 24 hours.

Share your story

You are in "Archive" section

This section contains descriptions of unexplained facts provided by eyewitnesses or published in the media, as well as the results of their analysis by the group.

UFO. Russia

ID #1563811921
Added Mon, 22/07/2019
Author July N.
Sources
Phenomena
Status
Hypothesis

Initial data

Initial information from sources or from an eyewitness
Incident date: 
20.07.2004
Location: 
 Выкса
Nizhegorodskaya oblast
Russia

Observer Sergey from the city of Vyksa:

I was at home in the bedroom. The weather was good, the wind is low. A few minutes later I headed into the kitchen, surprised to looking in the kitchen window, I noticed just above the horizon a red glow.

At first I tried to determine the source of the light flux. He was some object, a UFO, I thought. The red glow lasted for 50 seconds, maybe a minute. The red glow was visually seen in the form of light propagation, the strength of the light flux can not say.

It took a few seconds and the power light flow began to decrease gradually, and eventually disappeared. After that, I tried to see the UFO, but all to no avail because it was enough dark and to determine the distance to the UFO was almost impossible, but the eye can be 2.5 km.

What about the witnesses do not know. But all this I did not notice the main thing: it is the emergence and subsequent spread of the red glow. If I went to the window a little earlier, you may have noticed the emergence and subsequent spread of red glow coming from the UFO. It was hard to tell at what distance from the UFO, spread that red glow.

Given the approximate distance of the UFO from our district, which was 2.5 km, we can assume and calculate the value range of the distance a red glow to our area.

I think that it was really real glow, because similar events described in the book by V. V. Potapov, “the Great mystery of UFOs of the 20th century”, 2002 edition. The Chapter is called “Alternative spacecraft” page 172, 174 page book is described:

“ One or two, can't remember exactly, ‘stopped’ somewhere on the border of Florida and Alabama. And as soon as it happened, began to glow red. Don't know what it meant. One thing was clear: the NORAD operators learned to distinguish a UFO from the usual earthly goals.”

I want to also note that during the emission of red light coming from a UFO, perhaps the UFO does not move. So after all what is meant emitting a red glow coming from the UFO? What is the nature of this illumination? What is the source of this illumination? The most important thing I want to say that all the time emitting a red glow coming from the UFO, I felt fine, nor any deviation such as nausea, body heat, fever, a feeling of weightlessness, was not.

Possible, affects a sufficient distance to define or calculate, is not possible. And then it begs the following question: can the pilots of UFOs (if they exist) to perform the decontamination, has not been studied subtle fields? And most importantly, what does this red glow, emanating from a UFO? Please in great detail to answer all these questions, to Express their point of view based on facts, attempt to find a scientific approach and try to prove the reality of the nature of red luminescence.

So, I give you a list of parts.

1.There is no exact date, approximately 20.07. on 10.08.2004 year.

2.The time of the evening, a phenomenon was observed, at about 22:20 to 22:40.

3.This phenomenon took place in the Nizhny Novgorod region Vyksa m-not Central.

4.In the city where it was obvious that glow was the road with night lights.

5.Weather – the stars, the wind is weak, the moon is visible.

6.The height of the red glow was about 80 – 110 meters.

7.The distance to the source of the red glow is difficult to determine, I have not been able to calculate the distance, I can only say to the eye, perhaps 800 meters.

8.Brightness is the red glow was quite uniform, in that moment of time, when I went to the window, but then the luminescence intensity was gradually weakened to the object, which I have not seen. I was under the impression that someone on Board this object, as if began to turn the knob, slider or button and the intensity of the red glow began to gradually decrease. Heterogeneity in a red glow was visible not.

9.About the power of the light flux can only say that the moon was brighter. About the light level, I can say that I could see the light of lights that illuminated the road.

10.Was observed a clear boundary of the scope of this glow.

11.It may well be that the red glow came from the source of its origin, which was at a certain height, so after this glow could not Shine lights in any buildings, and the stars also do not show through, although the weather was good and the stars were that day. The glow was opaque, and therefore obscured to a certain part of the sky.

12.I just saw and I can say that this is the red glow shrank to the object (UFO).

13.At the moment the red glow and its subsequent weakening and disappearance, it took about 50 seconds maybe a minute.

14.I also want to note one important detail: the distance to the source of illumination and the distance, where does that red glow, was uneven in terms of distance. As far as it had gave up, no one knows.

15.On account of the witnesses do not know because I was standing in the kitchen and stared at the shining. Our home is a 9 – storey, a phenomenon I watched from the 5th floor.

16.From all this I have not noticed the stage appearance of the glow, but noticed very red glow and shrink. Own version. I think that we can not talk about any plasma formations of a type of ball lightning (plasmoids) because in your observation is exactly right about the version of the source of the red glow. There is a theory that this may be a mechanism, a device located on the body of the object. And perhaps the body can emit luminescence. In any case, you need to study the nature of the luminescence. But the main thing is not this, but that still means that red glow?

Not much about myself: the first mention of UFO in my life occurred in 1988. Fond of the UFO phenomenon since the summer of 2002. Young, age 22 years. I read almost all the UFO magazines from 1998 to 2002. Believe in the existence of the UFO phenomenon, but much is not proven. Circle very often a falsification of the account of the UFO phenomenon. Ufologists want to eat, and they are writing a book, inventing events that do not have a place in history.

I also believe that in recent years, there was nothing fundamentally new that would help ufologists to the problem of UFOs and aliens. And if you collect all the "new stories and pictures" - no time is not enough. In addition, these resources already exist. Here you need to act in a professional manner, having all of the tools and devices. And only then wait for success in resolving the UFO phenomenon.

Translated by «Yandex.Translator»

Hypotheses

List of versions containing features matching the eyewitness descriptions or material evidence

Light sources on clouds

Lasers, searchlights, car headlights and other light sources of sufficient power can form a column of light in a dusty or foggy atmosphere, various patterns on low clouds, fog or haze. Also, the rays can highlight parts of the cloud, objects or birds, giving them bizarre shapes.

Searchlights can shine with one beam, several. They can be stationary, move, and also form spinning carousels on the clouds, which can change shape and color.

It often seems that the light source is located at the point where the beam hits the cloud, and not vice versa.

Investigation

Versions testing, their confirmation or refutation. Additional information, notes during the study of materials
Not enough information

Resume

The most likely explanation. The version, confirmed by the investigation
Not enough information

Similar facts


Log in or register to post comments

Site friends

  • Мир тайн — сайт о таинственном
  • Activite-Paranormale
  • UFOlats
  • Новый Бестиарий
  • The Field Reports
  • UFO Meldpunt Nederland
  • GRUPO DE ESTUDOS DE UFOLOGIA CIENTÍFICA
  • Паранормальная наука, наука об аномалиях
  • Новости уфологии
  • UFO Insights
  • Mundo Ovnis

Attention!

18+

Site contains materials that are not recommended for impressionable people.

You are reporting a typo in the following text:
Simply click the "Send typo report" button to complete the report. You can also include a comment.