| ID | #1648460244 |
| Añadido | Lun, 28/03/2022 |
| Autor | July N. |
| Fuentes | |
| Fenómenos | |
| Estado | Estudio
|
Datos iniciales
El viajero cree que pueden haber encontrado huellas reales de Bigfoot , y los usuarios de Internet van y vienen, verificando si son reales.
Dos imágenes de la supuesta huella De Bigfoot se publicaron en la página de Reddit r/Bigfoot.
Las imágenes tomadas en Georgia, Estados Unidos, muestran una huella nítida y profunda en el barro, y junto a ella hay una bota de viajero para dar una sensación de escala.
Aunque el póster original no muestra el Tamaño de sus zapatos, su pie no supera los dos tercios de la longitud de la huella del monstruo.
Noticias originales
A hiker reckons they may have found some actual Bigfoot tracks, and internet users are going back and forth over whether they are real.
Two images of the supposed Sasquatch footprint were shared to Reddit page r/Bigfoot, the "home of all things Bigfoot" according to its description.
The snaps, taken in Georgia, US, show a clear and deep imprint in the mud, with the hiker's shoe placed next to it to offer some sense of scale.
Although the original poster didn't reveal their shoe size, their foot is at most two thirds as long as the monster footprint.
The images have split the community of Bigfoot enthusiasts, with many saying the hiker may have made a historic discovery.
One person wrote: "Looks legit to me. At first I thought it might be a bear but it lacks the claw marks that would be obvious in soft ground like that."
To which someone else replied: "That was my thought as well."
"Fresh squatch trax," added another.
However, others offered an interesting theory suggesting that it could still be a bear track.
One said: "I will go with bear track. Bears often walk with the front and rear paws landing in the same spot which will look like one big print. In the middle of the track you can see where the two paws overlap."
Hipótesis
Investigación
Currículum
Inicie sesión o regístrese para comentar
